Contract Disputes

Contract Disputes

Contracts are the lifeblood of commerce — governing partnerships, protecting expectations, and managing risk. When a contract dispute arises, it can disrupt key operations, jeopardize valuable relationships, and expose a business to significant financial harm. At Kitchen Law Group, we approach these disputes with the precision and strategic foresight necessary to protect what matters most.

Led by founder Jonathan Saville Kitchen — a nationally recognized trial lawyer and business strategist — our firm brings over four decades of experience resolving complex contract disputes. From clear-cut breaches to high-stakes, multi-party litigation involving millions of dollars, we’re known for our ability to analyze detailed contractual provisions, identify leverage, and execute winning strategies in and out of the courtroom.

We represent clients across a broad range of industries in disputes involving:

  • Commercial leases
  • Real estate transactions
  • Construction and development agreements
  • Vendor, supplier, and service contracts
  • Licensing, distribution, and joint venture agreements
  • Partnership and operating agreements



Our method is always client centric. We take time to understand each client’s business model, objectives, and risk profile — enabling us to craft solutions that align with broader goals, not just legal outcomes. Whether we are negotiating resolutions, arbitrating disputes, or taking a case to trial, we are tireless in pursuit of clarity, control, and results.

Our trial-readiness gives clients a distinct advantage. Even in disputes that settle, our reputation for meticulous preparation and courtroom excellence often shifts the balance in negotiations.

At Kitchen Law Group, contract disputes aren’t just legal problems — they’re strategic turning points. We help our clients seize those moments, defend their interests, and move forward with confidence.

Representative Case Study 

Tayor Morrison v Terracon – successful prosecution through trial of a case over defective soil testing leading to a subdivision collapse with limitation of liability contract defenses.